Americas Role in the Cuban Revolution :: American America History

Americas Role in the Cuban Revolution The diversity in Cuba was non a result of economical deprivation, norbecause of high expectations in the economy, it was the political factorsand expectations which evoked the civilians to revolt. The Cuban economywas pitiable forward at the time before the rebellion but the plethoricinfluence of the sugar industry made the economy assymetrical andencouraged no dynamic industrial sector. Because of the dependance onsugar, the unemployment rate ranged surrounded by 16 and 20% rising and fallingwith sugar prices, ebbing and catamenia as the season changed. The ruralwage levels were incredibly unsteady and aleatory the standard ofliving was low. Dependance on the sugar industry did not retard the economyof Cuba, just the wages of its workers. It was the bequeathers of the nationwho reaped turn a profit from this dependance, and it was the leaders of thenation who insisted on keeping the nation the way it was. By the mid1950s, however, the middle class had expanded to 33% of the population. Democracy, as we see it, broke down the large middle class did not cite democratic leadership, there was no social militancy in the functionalclass ranks, and the people found order preferable to disarray. Batistacould no seven-day legitimize his regime. Failure in the elections of 1954showed the discontent of the people, and failure in communication theory with theUnited States illustrated its discontent. Finally, opposing forcesconfronted Batistas power there were street protests, confrontationswith the police, assault, sabotage, and urban violence. This began therevolution in Cuba. America, with its stubborn ideas and misjudgements of character, forcedCastro to turn to the Soviets for alliance and aid. When Castro visitedthe United States in April, 1959, there were different respectedindividuals holding different views of him and his future actions. Nixonbelieved Castro to be naive, some others thought him a we lcome change fromBatista, still others called him an unfledged but effective leader, withouta well formed view of how to lead a revolutionary movement and not overlyconcerned with plagiarize of philosophical matters (p. 55). Why, then, didthe United States impress nit-picky ideals same there should not becommunists in the Army or in labor, or Cubas come near to the Batistatrials is totally unacceptable, too casual, too nonchalant on thisforming leader? Castro was like an inexperienced murderer with a gun inhis hand any rustle in the background could set off his nervous blow up